The Big Three, Part Three: Total Destruction

This page turned out to be the most difficult to write. And it’s not because the argument of total destruction of the structures is so convincing. On the contrary, there’s not much of an argument there to counter!

There’s also so much overlap in this particular statement with other parts of what AE911Truth says. Piledriver, Ready for Shipment, Pulverization — pages addressing those elements all will have similar language in them.

That language boils down to this: Bazant Zhou is Bazant Zhou is Bazant Zhou. The 9/11 Truth Movement thinks that they’ve dispensed with this paper and the ones proceeding from its analysis, but they haven’t. Their only two “peer-reviewed” articles — Gourley and Bjorkman — responded to Bazant’s articles in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, and they had their “peer review” published immediately after their texts. It was from Bazant himself, who demonstrated with ease why their critiques told us more about the authors’ need to retake basic structural engineering classes than about the collapses.

So, of course, the Truth Movement will not accept this page as refutation. And until I write the other three pages I mentioned, I suppose the point will not fully be addressed. So I’ll get around to it eventually. But come on! Alan Wake’s first DLC episode dropped this week, and I’m only up to the crypt already!

July 31, 2010 · Joseph Nobles · Comments Closed
Tags: , ,  · Posted in: AE911Truth's Arguments